Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong Expresses Concern Over Rumors of SEC Ban on Crypto Staking for Retail Customers

Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, expressed concern about rumors that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may eliminate cryptocurrency staking for retail customers in the United States. Armstrong insisted that “staking is not a security” and that the trend allows users to “participate directly in running open crypto networks.”

Coinbase CEO Vocalizes Worry Over US Stifling Crypto Staking and Innovation

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said he has heard rumors that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) plans to eliminate cryptocurrency staking for retail customers in the U.S. Armstrong shared his views on Twitter and stated that he doesn’t believe the top securities regulator should ban cryptocurrency staking in the country. “I hope that’s not the case,” Armstrong wrote, “as I believe it would be a terrible path for the U.S. if that were allowed to happen.”

Sharing a “primer” on the subject written by Paradigm, Armstrong stressed that staking is not a security. “Staking is a really important innovation in crypto,” the Coinbase CEO said. “It allows users to participate directly in running open crypto networks. Staking brings many positive improvements to the space, including scalability, increased security, and reduced carbon footprints.”

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong Expresses Concern Over Rumors of SEC Ban on Crypto Staking for Retail Customers

Armstrong argued that new technologies need to be fostered, not stifled, in the U.S. and that it is important for the country to have clear rules for financial services and Web3 industries for national security reasons. “Regulation by enforcement doesn’t work,” Armstrong said. “It encourages companies to operate offshore, as happened with FTX.” Not everyone agreed with Armstrong, as some quickly criticized staking and decentralized finance (defi). “It’s almost like defi and staking isn’t decentralized,” one person quipped in Armstrong’s Twitter thread.

Others poked fun at SEC Chairman Gary Gensler with a picture that included a quote that said: “Guess it’s time for more protection.” Another individual tweeted, “Realistically, the Howey test is so broad that pretty much everything is a security. The real test is whether the SEC wants to/feels like it can regulate the thing.” Armstrong hopes that the industry will work together to establish clear rules and “sensible solutions” that protect consumers while also “preserving innovation and national security interests” in the country.

Tags in this story
ban, Brian Armstrong, ceo, clear rules, Coinbase, companies, Consumers, Criticism, Crypto, Cryptocurrency, Decentralized finance (Defi), Financial Services, fostered, ftx, Gary Gensler, Howey Test, increased security, Innovation, National Security, national security interests, new technologies, offshore, open crypto networks, primers, reduced carbon footprints, regulation by enforcement, Regulations, regulator, retail customers, rumors, Scalability, SEC, sec chairman, securities regulator, sensible solutions, staking, stifled, Twitter, views, Web3 industries

What do you think about Brian Armstrong’s hearing rumors about the potential ban on cryptocurrency staking by the SEC? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is the News Lead at Bitcoin.com News and a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 6,000 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.




Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Read disclaimer